Shroud of turin carbon dating problems

While Sophisticated Theologians may argue that God is beyond all evidence, being an imperceptible and indefinable spirit that can neither be defined nor seen as interacting with the cosmos, that’s not what most believers think.

So, for instance, claims that Jesus was born of a virgin, died, and was resurrected, or that Mohammad went to heaven on a horse, or that Joseph Smith received the golden plates in New York and translated them into English, or that 75 million years ago Xenu loaded his alien minions onto planes resembling DC-8s, or that there is an afterlife and that good people go to Heaven, or that God hears and answers prayers, or that God is benevolent and all-powerful—these are claims about the way the world is.

Although scientists and artists aren’t yet sure how the image was made (it appears to include type AB blood, suggesting, since Mary was a virgin, that God carried either an A or a B blood-group allele (or both)).

But what is not in serious dispute is that radiocarbon dating of the linen shroud by three independent labs puts its manufacture at between 1000 AD to 1260 AD.

The third source is Joseph of Arimathea, who, according to the Gospels, donated his own future tomb to Jesus.

His “narrative,” a non-canonical Gospel that mentions an earthquake, is not accepted by scholars as independent evidence for the historicity of Jesus; indeed, I can find no credible evidence that this Joseph even lived. cite, of all sources, Dante’s (XXI, Canto: 106-114) as mentioning a big earthquake!

Since a carbon-containing sample will possess, when it is formed or when its possessor died (like an old piece of wood), the same ratio of carbon-14 to carbon-12 present in the atmosphere at the time of manufacture or death, the carbon-14 will gradually decay since no more carbon can be absorbed from the atmosphere.

At the end, if we know the rate at which carbon-14 decays (its half-life is 5720 years), we can estimate the age of a sample by simply measuring the ratio of C-14/C-12.

The Vatican itself takes no position on the authenticity of the shroud, which of course means that Catholics are free to believe that the shroud could be real. But religionists, in their pseudoscientific way, won’t give up.

Although there is evidence that some earthquakes can transitorily release substantial amounts of neutrons into the atmosphere, there are three scientific problems with the authors’ hypothesis.1. D., and whose works mention Jesus as well as an earthquake and a solar eclipse that happened during the Crucifixion.

This evidence is not credible (there was no solar eclipse then), and Biblical scholars no longer accept Thallos’s quoted words as evidence for the historicity of Jesus.

It’s an attempt to refute scientific radiocarbon dating of the Shroud, which showed it to be a medieval forgery, by special pleading invoking earthquakes. You almost surely know that the Shroud of Turin is a sheet of linen that reposes behind closed doors in the Cathedral of St. And it bears the likeness of a man who is said to be Jesus.

Indeed, the cloth is reputed to be the very burial shroud of Jesus.

Leave a Reply